Infrastructure vs Assistant


Summary


Use Case Comparison

Use Case Vapi et al. Redial
Singleton Integrations
(One calendar, email, etc) ✅ Built in 🟨 With tool calling
Call-center use
(e.g. one business w one shared calendar, one type of task, etc) ✅ Well-matched ✅ Works just as well
Thousands of users, each with their own data, apps, accounts, integrations ❌ Complicated and brittle ✅ Built for this
Auto Prompt Enhancement ❌ Unavailable ✅ Easy
Customization per call,
Dynamic Context ⚠️ Hacky, limited, difficult ✅ Easy
Time to First Call in Code ⚠️ 30+ minutes ✅ 3 minutes
Conversation Flow ⚠️ Platform setup required ✅ Set up in code in plain text,
or auto-generated based on context

Limitations of Vapi’s Assistant Model

  1. Singleton Integrations
  2. Static Assistants
  3. Heavy Developer Overhead
  4. Quality Requires Manual Effort
    1. Developers must use one of the platform’s templates, drag-and-drop flows, or carefully study and construct their own.

How Redial Is Different

  1. Per-User Integration